Risk Factors Dashboard

Once a year, publicly traded companies issue a comprehensive report of their business, called a 10-K. A component mandated in the 10-K is the ‘Risk Factors’ section, where companies disclose any major potential risks that they may face. This dashboard highlights all major changes and additions in new 10K reports, allowing investors to quickly identify new potential risks and opportunities.

Risk Factors - JEF

-New additions in green
-Changes in blue
-Hover to see similar sentence in last filing

Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Employee Benefits
Our benefits are designed to attract, support and retain
employees by providing employees and their spouses, partners
and families with health and wellness programs (medical, dental,
vision and behavioral), retirement wealth accumulation, paid time
off, income replacement (paid sick and disability leaves and life
insurance) and family-oriented benefits (parental leaves and child
care assistance). We also provide all our employees with benefits
to support inclusive fertility health and family-forming benefits.
We have continued to broaden our inclusive benefits offering by
adding menopause support as well. This year, we expanded our
primary caregiver leave time in the United States and provided
coaching to individuals going out and returning from primary
caregiver leave globally. We also endeavor to provide location
specific health club, transportation and employee discounts.
Giving Back to Community
The firm is committed to giving back to our communities. In
2024, we donated $3.8 million to over 200 organizations across a
number of Jefferies-supported charitable initiatives. Additionally,
through our Employee Resource Groups, employees have created
lasting partnerships by volunteering time to support several of
these charitable partners.
Competition
All aspects of our business are intensely competitive. We
compete primarily with large global bank holding companies that
engage in investment banking and capital markets activities as
one of their lines of business and that have greater capital and
resources than we do. We also compete against other broker-
dealers, asset managers and boutique firms. We believe the
principal factors driving our competitiveness include our ability to
provide differentiated insights to our clients that lead to better
business outcomes, to attract, retain and develop skilled
professionals and to deliver a competitive breadth of high-quality
service offerings; our vast global footprint; the depth and breadth
of our capabilities in Investment Banking and Capital Markets;
and our ability to maintain a flat, nimble and entrepreneurial
culture built on immediacy and client service.
Regulation
Regulation in the United States. The financial services industry in
which we operate is subject to extensive regulation. As a publicly
traded company and through our investment bank, investment
management and derivative businesses in the U.S., we are
subject to the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”). In the U.S., the SEC is the federal agency
responsible for the administration of federal securities laws, and
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) which is
the federal agency responsible for the administration of laws
relating to commodity interests (including futures, commodity
options and swaps). In addition, the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) and the National Futures Association
(“NFA”) are self-regulatory organizations (“SROs”) that are
actively involved in the regulation of our financial services
businesses (securities businesses in the case of FINRA and
commodities/futures businesses in the case of the NFA). Broker-
dealers that conduct securities activities involving municipal
securities are also subject to regulation by the Municipal
Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”). In addition to federal
regulation, we are subject to state securities regulations in each
state and U.S. territory in which we conduct securities or
investment advisory activities and to regulation by other SROs
within the U.S. and the securities exchanges and execution
facilities of which we are a member. The SEC, FINRA, CFTC, NFA,
SROs and state securities regulators conduct periodic
examinations of broker-dealers, investment advisors, futures
commission merchants (“FCMs”), swap dealers, security-based
swap dealers (“SBS dealers”) and over the counter derivatives
dealer (“OTCDD”). The designated examining authority under the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”) for Jefferies LLC’s activities as a broker-dealer is
FINRA, and the designated self-regulatory organization (“DSRO”)
under the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act for Jefferies LLC’s non-
clearing FCM activities is the NFA. As it pertains to Jefferies
Financial Services Inc. (“JFSI”), the designated examining
authority for its activities as an SEC registered SBS dealer and
OTCDD is the SEC, while the DSRO for its activities as a swap
dealer registered with the CFTC is the NFA. Financial services
businesses are also subject to regulation and examination by
state securities regulators and attorneys general in those states
in which they do business. In addition, broker-dealers, investment
advisors, FCMs, swap dealers, SBS dealers and OTCDD must also
comply with the rules and regulation of clearing houses,
exchanges, swap execution facilities and trading platforms of
which they are a member.
Broker-dealers are subject to SEC, FINRA, MSRB, SRO and state
securities regulations that cover all aspects of the securities
business, including sales and trading methods, trade practices
among broker-dealers, use and safekeeping of customers’ funds
and securities, capital structure and requirements, anti-money
laundering efforts, recordkeeping and the conduct of broker-
dealer personnel including officers and employees (although
state securities regulations are, in a number of cases, more
limited). Registered investment advisors are subject to, among
other requirements, SEC regulations concerning marketing,
transactions with affiliates, custody of client assets, disclosures
to clients, conflict of interest, insider trading and recordkeeping;
and investment advisors that are also registered as commodity
trading advisors or commodity pool operators are also subject to
regulation by the CFTC and the NFA. Additional legislation,
changes in rules promulgated by the SEC, FINRA, CFTC, NFA
other SROs of which the broker-dealer is a member, and state
securities regulators, or changes in the interpretation or
enforcement of existing laws or rules may directly affect the
operations and profitability of broker-dealers, investment
advisors, FCMs, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool
operators, swap dealers and SBS dealers. The SEC, CFTC, FINRA,
NFA, state securities regulators and state attorneys general may
conduct administrative proceedings or initiate civil litigation that
can result in adverse consequences for Jefferies LLC, JFSI, and
its affiliated entities, including affiliated investment advisors, as
well as its and their officers and employees (including, without
limitation, injunctions, censures, fines, suspensions, directives
that impact business operations (including proposed
expansions), membership expulsions, or revocations of licenses
and registrations).
November 2024 Form 10-K
6
The investment advisers responsible for the Jefferies’ investment
management businesses are all registered as investment
advisers with the SEC or rely upon the registration of an affiliated
adviser, and all are currently exempt from registration as
Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors.
Registered investment advisers are subject to the requirements
of the Advisers Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
Such requirements relate to, among other things, fiduciary duties
to clients, maintaining an effective compliance program,
operational and marketing requirements, disclosure obligations,
conflicts of interest, fees and prohibitions on fraudulent
activities.
The investment activities are also subject to regulation under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the “Investment Company Act”) and various other
statutes, as well as the laws of the fifty states and the rules of
various United States and non-United States securities
exchanges and self-regulatory organizations, including laws
governing trading on inside information, market manipulation and
a broad number of technical requirements (e.g., options and
futures position limits, execution requirements and reporting
obligations) and market regulation policies in the United States
and globally. Congress, regulators, tax authorities and others
continue to explore and implement regulations governing all
aspects of the financial services industry. Pursuant to systemic
risk reporting requirements adopted by the SEC, Jefferies’
affiliated registered investment advisers with private investment
fund clients are required to report certain information about their
investment funds to the SEC.
Regulatory Capital Requirements. Regulatory Capital Requirements. Several of our regulated entities
are subject to financial capital requirements that are set by
applicable local regulations.
Jefferies LLC is a dually registered broker-dealer and FCM and is
required to maintain net capital in excess of the greater of the
SEC or CFTC minimum financial requirements. As a broker-
dealer, Jefferies LLC is subject to the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital
Rule 15c3-1 (the “Net Capital Rule”), which specifies the
minimum level of net capital a broker-dealer must maintain and
also requires that a significant part of a broker-dealer's assets be
kept in relatively liquid form. The SEC and various self-regulatory
organizations impose rules that require notification when net
capital falls below certain predefined criteria, limit the ratio of
subordinated debt to equity in the regulatory capital composition
of a broker-dealer and constrain the ability of a broker-dealer to
expand its business under certain circumstances. Jefferies LLC
has elected to compute its minimum net capital requirement in
accordance with the “Alternative Net Capital Requirement” as
permitted by the Net Capital Rule, which provides that a broker-
dealer shall not permit its net capital, as defined, to be less than
the greater of 2% of its aggregate debit balances (primarily
customer-related receivables) or $250,000 ($1.5 million for prime
brokers, as applicable to Jefferies LLC). Compliance with the Net
Capital Rule could limit Jefferies LLC’s operations, such as
underwriting and trading activities and financing customers’
prime brokerage or other margin activities, in each case, that
could require the use of significant amounts of capital, limit its
ability to engage in certain financing transactions, such as
repurchase agreements, and may also restrict its ability (i) to
make payments of dividends, withdrawals or similar distributions
or payments to a stockholder/parent or other affiliate, (ii) to make
a redemption or repurchase of shares of stock, or (iii) to make an
unsecured loan or advance to such shareholders or affiliates. As
a carrying/clearing broker-dealer, under FINRA Rule 4110, FINRA
could impose higher minimum net capital requirements than
required by the SEC and could restrict a broker-dealer from
expanding business or require the broker-dealer to reduce its
business activities. As a non-clearing FCM, Jefferies LLC is also
required to maintain minimum adjusted net capital of $1.0 million
under CFTC rules.
JFSI is dually registered with the SEC as an SBS dealer and
OTCDD and registered with the CFTC as a swap dealer. JFSI is
required to comply with the SEC and CFTC capital rules for SBS
dealers and swap dealers, respectively. Further, as an OTCDD,
JFSI is subject to compliance with the SEC’s net capital
requirements.
As an SEC registered OTCDD and security-based swap dealer,
JFSI is subject to rules regarding capital, segregation and margin
requirements. The CFTC and NFA have also adopted similar
swap dealer capital rules. Under the rules there are minimum
capital requirements for, among others, an entity that acts as a
dealer in SBS or swaps, of $100 million in tentative net capital or
the greater of $20 million or 2% (that the SEC could, in the future,
increase up to 4% or 8%) of a risk margin amount in net capital.
The risk margin amount for the SEC means the sum of (i) the
total initial margin required to be maintained by the SEC-
registered SBS dealer at each clearinghouse with respect to SBS
or swap transactions cleared for SBS or swap customers and (ii)
the total initial margin amount calculated by the SEC-registered
SBS dealer with respect to non-cleared SBS and swaps under the
SEC rules. The risk margin amount for the CFTC means the total
initial margin amount calculated by the CFTC-registered swap
dealer with respect to non-cleared SBS and swaps under the
CFTC rules.
Under the Exchange Act, state securities regulators are not
permitted to impose capital, margin, custody, financial
responsibility, making and keeping records, bonding, or financial
or operational reporting requirements on registered broker-
dealers that differ from, or are in addition to, the requirements in
those areas established under the Exchange Act, including the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
For additional information refer to Item 1A.For additional information see Item 1A. Risk Factors -
“Legislation and regulation may significantly affect our business.”
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. is not subject to any regulatory
capital rules.
Refer to Net Capital within Item 7. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis and Note 22, Regulatory Requirements in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for additional discussion of net capital
calculations.
Regulation outside the United States. We are an active participant
in the international capital markets and provide investment
banking services internationally, primarily in Europe and the
Middle East and Asia-Pacific. Jefferies International Limited,
which is the principal operating subsidiary of Jefferies in the U.K.,
maintains regulatory capital aligned with the two key regulatory
pillars. Pillar 1 is its own funds requirement which represents the
highest of the permanent minimum capital requirement, fixed
overheads requirement and k-factor requirements set out in the
Investment Firms Prudential Regime (“IFPR”) under the Financial
Conduct Authority’s (“FCA”) MIFIDPRU sourcebook, while Pillar 2
pertains to the International Capital Adequacy and Risk
Assessment (“ICARA”) process whereby Jefferies International
Limited ensures that it maintains capital in excess of minimum
regulatory capital requirements under both normal and stressed
conditions. Our international subsidiaries are subject to extensive
regulations proposed, promulgated and enforced by, among
7
Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
other regulatory bodies, the European Commission and European
Supervisory Authorities (including the European Banking
Authority and European Securities and Market Authority), the U.K.
Financial Conduct Authority, the German Federal Financial
Supervisory Authority (“BaFin”), the Canadian Investment
Regulatory Organization, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory
Authority (“FINMA”), the Dubai Financial Services Authority, the
Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, the Japan
Financial Services Agency, the Monetary Authority of Singapore,
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and the
Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”). Every country in
which we do business imposes upon us laws, rules and
regulations similar to those in the U.S., including with respect to
some form of capital adequacy rules, customer protection rules,
data protection regulations, anti-money laundering and anti-
bribery rules, compliance with other applicable trading and
investment banking regulations and similar regulatory reform.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Factors Affecting Our Business
The following factors describe some of the assumptions, risks,
uncertainties and other factors that could adversely affect our
business or that could necessitate unforeseen changes to the
ways we operate our businesses or could otherwise result in
changes that differ materially from our expectations. In addition
to the specific factors mentioned in this report, we may also be
affected by other factors that affect businesses generally, such
as global or regional changes in economic, business or political
conditions, acts of war, terrorism, pandemics, climate change,
and natural disasters.
Credit, Market and Liquidity Risks
Our business is subject to significant credit risk.
In the normal course of our businesses, we are involved in the
execution, settlement and financing of various customer and
principal securities and derivative transactions. These activities
are transacted on a cash, margin or delivery-versus-payment
basis and are subject to the risk of counterparty or customer
nonperformance. Even when transactions are collateralized by
the underlying security or other securities, we still face the risks
associated with changes in the market value of the collateral
through settlement date or during the time when margin is
extended and collateral has not been secured or the counterparty
defaults before collateral or margin can be adjusted. We may
also incur credit risk in our derivative transactions to the extent
such transactions result in uncollateralized credit exposure to our
counterparties.
We seek to control the risk associated with these transactions by
establishing and monitoring credit limits and by monitoring
collateral and transaction levels daily. We may require
counterparties to deposit additional collateral or return collateral
pledged. In certain circumstances, we may, under industry
regulations, purchase the underlying securities in the market and
seek reimbursement for any losses from the counterparty.
However, there can be no assurances that our risk controls will
be successful.
We are exposed to significant market risk and our principal
trading and investments expose us to risk of loss.
Market risk generally represents the risk that values of assets
and liabilities or revenues will be adversely affected by changes
in market conditions. Market risk is inherent in the financial
instruments associated with our operations and activities,
including trading account assets and liabilities, loans, securities,
short-term borrowings, corporate debt and derivatives. Market
conditions that change from time to time, thereby exposing us to
market risk, include fluctuations in interest rates, equity prices,
relative exchange rates, and price deterioration or changes in
value due to changes in market perception or actual credit quality
of an issuer.
In addition, disruptions in the liquidity or transparency of the
financial markets may result in our inability to sell, syndicate or
realize the value of security positions, thereby leading to
increased concentrations. The inability to reduce our positions in
specific securities may not only increase the market and credit
risks associated with such positions, but also increase capital
requirements, which could have an adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
A considerable portion of our revenues is derived from trading in
which we act as principal. We may incur trading losses relating to
the purchase, sale or short sale of fixed income, high yield,
international, convertible and equity securities, loans, derivative
contracts and commodities for our own account. In any period,
we may experience losses on our inventory positions as a result
of the level and volatility of equity, fixed income and commodity
prices (including oil prices), lack of trading volume and illiquidity.
From time to time, we may engage in a large block trade in a
single security or maintain large position concentrations in a
single security, securities of a single issuer, securities of issuers
engaged in a specific industry or securities from issuers located
in a particular country or region. In general, because our inventory
is marked to market on a daily basis, any adverse price
movement in these securities could result in a reduction of our
revenues and profits. In addition, we may engage in hedging
transactions that if not successful, could result in losses.
Increased market volatility may also impact our revenues as
transaction activity in our investment banking and capital
markets sales and trading businesses can be negatively
impacted in a volatile market environment.
Refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations-Risk Management within
Part II, Item 7. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional
discussion.
A credit-rating agency downgrade could significantly impact our
business.
The cost and availability of financing generally are impacted by
(among other things) our credit ratings. If any of our credit
ratings were downgraded, or if rating agencies indicate that a
downgrade may occur, our business, financial position and
results of operations could be adversely affected and
perceptions of our financial strength could be damaged, which
could adversely affect our client relationships. Additionally, we
intend to access the capital markets and issue debt securities
from time to time, and a decrease in our credit ratings or outlook
could adversely affect our liquidity and competitive position,
increase our borrowing costs, decrease demand for our debt
securities and increase the expense and difficulty of financing
our operations. In addition, in connection with certain over-the-
counter derivative contract arrangements and certain other
trading arrangements, we may be required to provide additional
collateral to counterparties, exchanges and clearing
organizations in the event of a credit rating downgrade. Such a
downgrade could also negatively impact the prices of our debt
securities. There can be no assurance that our credit ratings will
not be downgraded.
November 2024 Form 10-K
8
As a holding company, we are dependent for liquidity from
payments from our subsidiaries, many of which are subject to
restrictions.
As a holding company, we depend on dividends, distributions and
other payments from our subsidiaries to fund payments on our
obligations, including debt obligations. Several of our
subsidiaries, particularly our broker-dealer subsidiaries and swap
dealer subsidiary, are subject to regulations that limit or restrict
dividend payments or reduce the availability of the flow of funds
from those subsidiaries to us. In addition, our broker-dealer
subsidiaries and swap dealer subsidiary are subject to
restrictions on their ability to lend or transact with affiliates and
are required to maintain minimum regulatory capital
requirements. These regulations may hinder our ability to access
funds that we may need to make payments to fulfill obligations.
From time to time we may invest in securities that are illiquid or
subject to restrictions.
From time to time we may invest in securities that are subject to
restrictions which prohibit us from selling the securities for a
period of time. Such agreements may limit our ability to generate
liquidity quickly through the disposition of the underlying
investment while the agreement is effective.
Economic Environment Risks
We may incur losses as a result of unforeseen or catastrophic
events, including the emergence of a pandemic, cybersecurity
incidents and events, terrorist attacks, war, trade policies,
military conflict, climate-related incidents or other natural
disasters.
The occurrence of unforeseen or catastrophic events, including
the emergence of a pandemic, such as COVID-19, or other
widespread health emergency (or concerns over the possibility of
such an emergency), cybersecurity incidents and events, terrorist
attacks, war, trade policies, military conflict, extreme climate-
related incidents or events or other natural disasters, could
create economic and financial disruptions, and could lead to
operational difficulties (including travel limitations) that could
impair our ability to manage our businesses. For instance, the
spread of illnesses or pandemics has, and could in the future,
cause illness, quarantines, various shutdowns, reduction in
business activity and financial transactions, labor shortages,
supply chain interruptions and overall economic and financial
market instability. In addition, geopolitical and military conflict
and war between Russia and Ukraine and Hamas and Israel have
and will continue to result in instability and adversely affect the
global economy or specific markets, which could continue to
have an adverse impact or cause volatility in the financial
services industry generally or on our results of operations and
financial conditions. In addition, these geopolitical tensions can
cause an increase in volatility in commodity and energy prices,
creating supply chain issues, and causing instability in financial
markets. Sanctions imposed by the United States and other
countries in response to such conflict could further adversely
impact the financial markets and the global economy, and any
economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others,
could exacerbate market and economic instability. While we do
not have any operations in Russia or any clients with significant
Russian operations and we have minimal market risk related to
securities of companies either domiciled or operating in Russia,
the specific consequences of the conflict in Ukraine on our
business is difficult to predict at this time. Likewise, our
investments and assets in our growing Israeli business could be
negatively affected by consequences from the geopolitical and
military conflict in the region. In addition to inflationary pressures
affecting our operations, we may also experience an increase in
cyberattacks against us and our third-party service providers
from Russia, Hamas or their allies.
Climate change concerns and incidents could disrupt our
businesses, adversely affect the profitability of certain of our
investments, adversely affect client activity levels, adversely
affect the creditworthiness of our counterparties and damage our
reputation.
Climate change may cause extreme weather events that disrupt
operations at one or more of our or our customer’s or client’s
locations, which may negatively affect our ability to service and
interact with our clients, and also may adversely affect the value
of certain of our investments, including our real estate
investments. Climate change, as well as uncertainties related to
the transition to a lower carbon dependent economy, may also
have a negative impact on the financial condition of our clients,
which may decrease revenues from those clients and increase
the credit risk associated with loans and other credit exposures
to those clients. Additionally, our reputation and client
relationships may be damaged as a result of our involvement, or
our clients’ involvement, in certain industries or projects
associated with causing or exacerbating climate change, as well
as any decisions we make to continue to conduct or change our
activities in response to considerations relating to climate
change.
New regulations or guidance relating to climate change and the
transition to a lower carbon dependent economy, as well as the
perspectives of shareholders, employees and other stakeholders
regarding climate change, may affect whether and on what terms
and conditions we engage in certain activities or offer certain
products, as well as impact our business reputation and efforts
to recruit and retain employees and customers.
Abrupt changes in market and general economic conditions have
in the past adversely affected, and may in the future adversely
affect, our business and profitability and cause volatility in our
results of operations.
Economic and market conditions have had, and will continue to
have, a direct and material impact on our results of operations
and financial condition because performance in the financial
services industry is heavily influenced by the overall strength of
general economic conditions and financial market activity.
Our investment banking revenue, in the form of advisory services
and underwriting, is directly related to general economic
conditions and corresponding financial market activity. When the
outlook for such economic conditions is uncertain or negative,
financial market activity generally tends to decrease, which
reduces our investment banking revenues. Reduced expectations
of U.S. economic growth or a decline in the global economic
outlook could cause financial market activity to decrease and
negatively affect our investment banking revenues.
A sustained and continuing market downturn could lead to or
exacerbate declines in the number of securities transactions
executed for clients and, therefore, to a decline in the revenues
we receive from commissions and spreads. Correspondingly, a
reduction of prices of the securities we hold in inventory or as
investments would lead to reduced revenues.
Revenues from our asset management businesses have been
and may continue to be negatively impacted by declining
securities prices, as well as widely fluctuating securities prices.
Because our asset management businesses hold long and short
positions in equity and debt securities, changes in the prices of
these securities, as well as any decrease in the liquidity of these
9
Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
securities, may materially and adversely affect our revenues from
asset management.
Similarly, our other investments businesses may suffer from the
above-mentioned impacts of fluctuations in economic and
market conditions, including reductions in business activity and
financial transactions, labor shortages, supply chain interruptions
and overall economic and financial market instability. In addition,
other factors, most of which are outside of our control, can affect
our businesses, including the state of the real estate market, the
state of the Italian telecommunications market, and the state of
international market and economic conditions which impact
trading volume and currency volatility, and changes in regulatory
requirements.
In addition, global economic conditions and global financial
markets remain vulnerable to the potential risks posed by certain
events, which could include, among other things, the level and
volatility of interest rates, the availability and market conditions
of financing, economic growth or its sustainability, unforeseen
changes to gross domestic product, inflation, energy prices,
fluctuations or other changes in both debt and equity capital
markets and currencies, political and financial uncertainty in the
United States and the European Union, ongoing concern about
Asia’s economies, global supply disruptions, complications
involving terrorism and armed conflicts around the world
(including the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and Hamas
and Israel, or other challenges to global trade or travel, such as
those that occur due to a pandemic). More generally, because
our business is closely correlated to the general economic
outlook, a significant deterioration in that outlook or realization of
certain events would likely have an immediate and significant
negative impact on our business and overall results of
operations.
Changing financial, economic and political conditions could result
in decreased revenues, losses or other adverse consequences.
Global or regional changes in the financial markets or economic
and political conditions could adversely affect our business in
many ways, including the following:
A market downturn, potential recession and high inflation, as
well as declines in consumer confidence and an increase in
unemployment rates, could lead to a decline in the volume of
transactions executed for customers and, therefore, to a
decline in the revenues we receive from commissions and
spreads. Any such economic downturn, volatile business
environment, hostile third-party action or continued
unpredictable and unstable market conditions could adversely
affect our general business strategies;
Unfavorable conditions or changes in general political,
economic or market conditions could reduce the number and
size of transactions in which we provide underwriting, financial
advisory and other services. Our investment banking revenues,
in the form of financial advisory, underwriting or placement
fees, are directly related to the number and size of the
transactions in which we participate and could therefore be
adversely affected by unfavorable financial, economic or
political conditions. In particular, the increasing trend toward
sovereign protectionism and de-globalization has resulted or
could result in decreases in free trade, erosion of traditional
international coalitions, the imposition of sanctions and tariffs,
governmental closures and no-confidence votes, domestic and
international strife, and general market upheaval in response to
such results, all of which could negatively impact our business;
Adverse changes in the securities markets could lead to a
reduction in revenues from asset management fees and losses
on our own capital invested in managed funds. Even in the
absence of a market downturn, below-market investment
performance by our funds and portfolio managers could
reduce asset management revenues and assets under
management and result in reputational damage that might
make it more difficult to attract new investors;
Adverse changes in the financial markets could lead to
regulatory restrictions that may limit or halt certain of our
business activities;
Limitations on the availability of credit can affect our ability to
borrow on a secured or unsecured basis, which may adversely
affect our liquidity and results of operations. Global market and
economic conditions have been particularly disrupted and
volatile in the last several years and may be in the future. Our
cost and availability of funding could be affected by illiquid
credit markets and wider credit spreads;
New or increased taxes on compensation payments such as
bonuses may adversely affect our profits;
Should one of our clients or competitors fail, our business
prospects and revenue could be negatively impacted due to
negative market sentiment causing clients to cease doing
business with us and our lenders to cease loaning us money,
which could adversely affect our business, funding and
liquidity;
Unfavorable economic conditions could have an adverse effect
on the demand for new loans and the servicing of loans
originated by third-parties, which would have an adverse
impact on the operations and profitability of some of our
financial services businesses.
Operational Risks
We may incur losses if our risk management is not effective.
We seek to monitor and control our risk exposure. Our risk
management processes and procedures are designed to limit our
exposure to acceptable levels as we conduct our business. We
apply a comprehensive framework of limits on a variety of key
metrics to constrain the risk profile of our business activities.
These limits reflect our risk tolerances for business activity. Our
framework includes inventory position and exposure limits on a
gross and net basis, scenario analysis and stress tests, Value-at-
Risk, sensitivities, exposure concentrations, aged inventory, the
amount of Level 3 assets, counterparty exposure, leverage, cash
capital and performance analysis. Refer to Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Risk Management within Part II. Item 7. of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional discussion. While we
employ various risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques,
those techniques and the judgments that accompany their
application, including risk tolerance determinations, cannot
anticipate every economic and financial outcome or the specifics
and timing of such outcomes. As a result, we may incur losses
notwithstanding our risk management processes and
procedures.
The ability to attract, develop and retain highly skilled and
productive employees is critical to the success of our business.
Our ability to develop and retain our clients depends on the
reputation, judgment, business generation capabilities and skills
of our professionals. To compete effectively, we must attract,
retain and motivate qualified professionals, including successful
investment bankers, sales and trading professionals, research
November 2024 Form 10-K
10
professionals, portfolio managers and other revenue producing
or specialized personnel, in addition to qualified, successful
personnel in functional, non-revenue producing roles.
Competitive pressures we experience with respect to employees
could have an adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Turnover in the financial services industry is high. The cost of
retaining skilled professionals in the financial services industry
has escalated considerably. Financial industry employers are
increasingly offering guaranteed contracts, upfront payments and
increased compensation. These can be important factors in a
current employee’s decision to leave us as well as in a
prospective employee’s decision to join us. As competition for
skilled professionals in the industry remains intense, we may
have to devote significant resources to attracting and retaining
qualified personnel.
If we were to lose the services of certain of our professionals, we
may not be able to retain valuable relationships and some of our
clients could choose to use the services of a competitor instead
of our services. If we are unable to retain our professionals or
recruit additional professionals, our reputation, business, results
of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected.
Further, new business initiatives and efforts to expand existing
businesses frequently require that we incur compensation and
benefits expense before generating additional revenues.
Moreover, companies in our industry whose employees accept
positions with competitors often claim that those competitors
have engaged in unfair hiring practices. We may be subject to
such claims in the future as we seek to hire qualified personnel
who have worked for our competitors. Some of these claims may
result in material litigation. We could incur substantial costs in
defending against these claims, regardless of their merits. Such
claims could also discourage potential employees who work for
our competitors from joining us.
We face increasing competition in the financial services industry.
We operate in an intensely competitive with other global bank
holding companies that engage in investment banking and
capital markets activities as one of their lines of business and
that have greater capital and resources than we do. We also
compete against other broker-dealers, asset managers and
boutique firms on both a global and regional basis. There is also
growing pressure to provide services at lower fees to appeal to
clients, which may impact our ability to effectively compete.
Operational risks may disrupt our business, result in regulatory
action against us or limit our growth.
Our businesses are highly dependent on our ability to process, on
a daily basis, a large number of transactions across numerous
and diverse markets in many currencies, and the transactions we
process have become increasingly complex. If any of our
financial, accounting or other data processing systems do not
operate properly, or are disabled, or if there are other
shortcomings or failures in our internal processes, people or
systems, we could suffer an impairment to our liquidity, financial
loss, a disruption of our businesses, liability to clients, regulatory
intervention or reputational damage. These systems may fail to
operate properly or become disabled as a result of events that
are wholly or partially beyond our control, including a disruption
of electrical or communications services or our inability to
occupy one or more of our buildings. The inability of our systems
to accommodate an increasing volume and complexity of
transactions could also constrain our ability to expand our
businesses.
Certain of our financial and other data processing systems rely
on access to and the functionality of operating systems
maintained by third-parties. If the accounting, trading or other
data processing systems on which we are dependent are unable
to meet increasingly demanding standards for processing and
security or, if they fail or have other significant shortcomings, we
could be adversely affected. Such consequences may include our
inability to effect transactions and manage our exposure to risk.
In addition, despite the contingency plans we have in place, our
ability to conduct business may be adversely impacted by a
disruption in the infrastructure that supports our businesses and
the communities in which they are located. This may include a
disruption involving electrical, communications, transportation or
other services used by us or third-parties with which we conduct
business.
Any cyber attack, cybersecurity incident, or other information
security breach of, or vulnerability in, our technology systems, or
those of our clients, partners, counterparties, or other third-party
service providers we rely on, could have operational impacts,
subject us to significant liability and harm our reputation.
Our operations rely heavily on the secure processing, storage and
transmission of financial, personal and other information in our
computer systems and networks. In recent years, there have
been several highly publicized incidents involving financial
services companies reporting the unauthorized disclosure of
client or other confidential information, as well as cyber attacks
involving theft, dissemination and destruction of corporate
information or other assets, which in some cases occurred as a
result of failure to follow procedures by employees or contractors
or as a result of actions by third-parties. Cyber attacks can
originate from a variety of sources, including third-parties
affiliated with foreign governments, organized crime or terrorist
organizations, and malicious individuals both outside and inside
a targeted company, including through use of relatively new
artificial intelligence tools or methods. Retaliatory acts by Russia,
Hamas or their allies in response to economic sanctions or other
measures taken by the global community arising from the Russia-
Ukraine and Hamas-Israel conflicts could result in an increased
number and/or severity of cyber attacks. Malicious actors may
also attempt to compromise or induce our employees, clients or
other users of our systems to disclose sensitive information or
provide access to our data, and these types of risks may be
difficult to detect or prevent.
Like other financial services firms, we and our third-party service
providers have been the target of cyber attacks. Although we and
our service providers regularly defend against, respond to and
mitigate the risks of cyberattacks, cybersecurity incidents among
financial services firms and industry generally are on the rise. We
are not aware of any material losses we have incurred relating to
cyber attacks or other information security breaches. The
techniques and malware used in these cyber attacks and
cybersecurity incidents are increasingly sophisticated, change
frequently and are often not recognized until launched because
they are novel. Although we monitor the changing cybersecurity
risk environment and seek to maintain reasonable security
measures, including a suite of authentication and layered
information security controls, no security measures are infallible,
and we cannot guarantee that our safeguards will always work or
that they will detect, mitigate or remediate these risks in a timely
manner. Despite our implementation of reasonable security
measures and endeavoring to modify them as circumstances
warrant, our computer systems, software and networks may be
vulnerable to spam attacks, unauthorized access, distributed
denial of service attacks, ransomware, computer viruses and
11
Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
other malicious code, as well as human error, natural disaster,
power loss, and other events that could damage our reputation,
impact the security and stability of our operations, and expose us
to class action lawsuits and regulatory investigation, action, and
penalties, and significant liability.
We also rely on numerous third-party service providers to
conduct other aspects of our business operations and we face
similar risks relating to them. While we evaluate the information
security programs and defenses of third-party vendors, we
cannot be certain that our reviews and oversight will identify all
potential information security weaknesses or that our vendors’
information security protocols are or will be sufficient to
withstand or adequately respond to a cyber attack, cybersecurity
incident or other information security breach. In addition, in order
to access our products and services, or trade with us, our
customers and counterparties may use networks, computers and
other devices that are beyond our security control systems and
processes.
Notwithstanding the precautions we take, if a cyber attack,
cybersecurity incident, or other information security breach were
to occur, this could jeopardize the information we confidentially
maintain, or otherwise cause interruptions in our operations or
those of our clients and counterparties, exposing us to liability.
As attempted attacks continue to evolve in scope and
sophistication, we may be required to expend substantial
additional resources to modify or enhance our reasonable
security measures, to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or
other exposures or to communicate about cyber attacks,
cybersecurity incidents or other information security breaches to
our customers, partners, third-party service providers and
counterparties. Though we have insurance against some cyber
risks and attacks, we may be subject to litigation and financial
losses that exceed our insurance policy limits or are not covered
under any of our current insurance policies. A technological
breakdown could also interfere with our ability to comply with
financial reporting and other regulatory requirements, exposing
us to potential disciplinary action by regulators. Successful cyber
attacks, cybersecurity incidents or other information security
breaches at other large financial institutions or other market
participants, whether or not we are affected, could lead to a
general loss of customer confidence in financial institutions that
could negatively affect us, including harming the market
perception of the effectiveness of our security measures or the
financial system in general, which could result in a loss of
business.
Further, in light of the high volume of transactions we process,
the large number of our clients, partners and counterparties, and
the increasing sophistication of malicious actors that may
employ increasingly sophisticated methods such as new artificial
intelligence tools, a cyber attack, cybersecurity incident, or other
information security breach could occur and persist for an
extended period of time without detection. We expect that any
investigation of a cyber attack, cybersecurity incident, or other
information security breach would take substantial amounts of
time and resources, and that there may be extensive delays
before we obtain full and reliable information. During such time
we would not necessarily know the extent of the harm caused by
the cyber attack, cybersecurity incident, or other information
security breach or how best to remediate it, and certain errors or
actions could be repeated or compounded before they are
discovered and remediated. All of these factors could further
increase the costs and consequences of such a cyber attack or
cybersecurity incident. In providing services to clients, we
manage, utilize and store sensitive or confidential client or
employee data, including personal data. As a result, we are
subject to numerous laws and regulations designed to protect
this information, such as U.S. and non-U.S. federal and state laws
governing privacy and cybersecurity. If any person, including any
of our associates, negligently disregards or intentionally
breaches our established controls with respect to client or
employee data, or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates
such data, we could be subject to significant monetary damages,
regulatory enforcement actions, fines and/or criminal
prosecution. In addition, unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or
confidential client or employee data, whether through system
compromise or failure, employee negligence, fraud or
misappropriation, could damage our reputation and cause us to
lose clients and related revenue. Depending on the
circumstances giving rise to the information security breach, this
liability may not be subject to a contractual limit or an exclusion
of consequential or indirect damages.
Damage to our reputation could damage our business.
Maintaining our reputation is critical to our attracting and
maintaining customers, investors and employees. If we fail to
deal with, or appear to fail to deal with, various issues that may
give rise to reputational risk, we could significantly harm our
business prospects. These issues include, but are not limited to,
any of the risks discussed in this Item 1A, appropriately dealing
with potential conflicts of interest, legal and regulatory
requirements, ethical issues, money-laundering, cybersecurity
and privacy, record keeping, sales and trading practices, failure to
sell securities we have underwritten at the anticipated price
levels, and the proper identification of the legal, reputational,
credit, liquidity and market risks inherent in our products. A
failure to deliver appropriate standards of service and quality, or a
failure or perceived failure to treat customers and clients fairly,
can result in customer dissatisfaction, litigation and heightened
regulatory scrutiny, all of which can lead to lost revenue, higher
operating costs and harm to our reputation. Further, negative
publicity regarding us, whether or not true, may also result in
harm to our prospects. Our operations in the past have been
impacted as some clients either ceased doing business or
temporarily slowed down the level of business they do, thereby
decreasing our revenue. There is no assurance that we will be
able to successfully reverse the negative impact of allegations
and rumors in the future and our potential failure to do so could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and liquidity.
Employee misconduct or fraud could harm us by impairing our
ability to attract and retain clients and subject us to significant
legal liability and reputational harm.
There is a risk that our employees could engage in fraud or other
misconduct that adversely affects our business. For example, we
are subject to a number of obligations and standards arising
from our asset management business and our responsibility over
the assets managed by this business. In addition, our financial
advisors may act in a fiduciary capacity, providing financial
planning, investment advice, and discretionary asset
management. Misconduct or fraud by employees, advisors, or
other third-party service providers could cause significant losses.
In addition, our business often requires that we deal with
confidential matters of great significance to our clients. If our
employees were to improperly use or disclose confidential
information provided by our clients, we could be subject to
regulatory sanctions and suffer serious harm to our reputation,
financial position, current client relationships and ability to attract
future clients. Employee misconduct or fraud could include,
among other things, binding us to unauthorized transactions that
present unacceptable risks, engaging in other unauthorized
November 2024 Form 10-K
12
activities or concealing unsuccessful investments. The violation
of these obligations and standards by any of our employees
would adversely affect our clients and us. It is not always
possible to deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we
take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective
against certain misconduct, including conduct which is difficult
to detect. The occurrence of significant employee misconduct
could have a material adverse financial effect or cause us
significant reputational harm and/or legal and regulatory liability,
which in turn could seriously harm our business and our
prospects.
We may not be able to insure certain risks economically.
We cannot be certain that we will be able to insure all risks that
we desire to insure economically or that all of our insurers or
reinsurers will be financially viable if we make a claim. If an
uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits should occur,
or if we are required to pay a deductible for an insured loss,
results of operations could be adversely affected.
Future acquisitions and dispositions of our businesses and
investments are possible, changing the components of our assets
and liabilities, and if unsuccessful or unfavorable, could reduce
the value of our securities.
Any future acquisitions or dispositions may result in significant
changes in the composition of our assets and liabilities, as well
as our business mix and prospects. Consequently, our financial
condition, results of operations and the trading price of our
securities may be affected by factors different from those
affecting our financial condition, results of operations and trading
price at the present time.
Our investment in Jefferies Finance may not prove to be
successful and may adversely affect our results of operations or
financial condition.
Many factors, most of which are outside of our control, can affect
Jefferies Finance’s business, including adverse investment
banking and capital market conditions leading to a decline of
syndicate loans, inability of borrowers to repay commitments,
adverse changes to a borrower’s credit worthiness, and other
factors that directly and indirectly effect the results of operations,
and consequently may adversely affect our results of operations
or financial condition.
Our investment in Berkadia may not prove to be successful and
may adversely affect our results of operations or financial
condition.
Many factors, most of which are outside of our control, can affect
Berkadia’s business, including loan losses in excess of reserves,
a change in the relationships with U.S. Government-Sponsored
Enterprises or federal agencies, a significant loss of customers,
and other factors that directly and indirectly effect the results of
operations, including the sales and profitability of Berkadia, and
consequently may adversely affect our results of operations or
financial condition.
If Berkadia suffered significant losses and was unable to repay its
commercial paper borrowings, we would be exposed to loss
pursuant to a reimbursement obligation to Berkshire Hathaway.
Berkadia obtains funds generated by commercial paper sales of
an affiliate of Berkadia. All of the proceeds from the commercial
paper sales are used by Berkadia to fund new mortgage loans,
servicer advances, investments and other working capital
requirements. Repayment of the commercial paper is supported
by a $1.5 billion surety policy issued by a Berkshire Hathaway
insurance subsidiary and a Berkshire Hathaway corporate
guaranty, and we have agreed to reimburse Berkshire Hathaway
for one-half of any losses incurred thereunder. If Berkadia suffers
significant losses and is unable to repay its commercial paper
borrowings, we would suffer losses to the extent of our
reimbursement obligation to Berkshire Hathaway.
Legal, Legislation and Regulation Risks
Legislation and regulation may significantly affect our business.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and the rules and regulations adopted by
the CFTC and the SEC introduced a comprehensive regulatory
regime for swaps and SBS and parties that deal in such
derivatives. One of our subsidiaries is registered as a swap dealer
with the CFTC and is a member of the NFA, is registered as a
security-based swap dealer with the SEC and is registered with
the SEC as an OTC Derivatives Dealer. We have incurred
significant compliance and operational costs as a result of the
swaps and SBS rules adopted by the CFTC and SEC pursuant to
the Dodd-Frank Act, and we expect that the complex regulatory
framework will continue to require significant monitoring and
compliance expenditures. Negative effects could result from an
expansive extraterritorial application of the Dodd-Frank Act and/
or insufficient international coordination with respect to adoption
of rules for derivatives and other financial reforms in other
jurisdictions.
Similar types of swap regulation have been proposed or adopted
in jurisdictions outside the U.S., including in the EU, the U.K. and
Japan. For example, the EU and the U.K. have established
regulatory requirements relating to portfolio reconciliation and
reporting, clearing certain OTC derivatives and margining for
uncleared derivatives activities under the European Market
Infrastructure Regulation (“EMIR”). Further enhancements (driven
by regulation) have been required in 2024 with respect to EMIR
OTC derivative transaction reporting, and affect our European
entities.
The Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation and a revision of
the Market in Financial Instruments Directive in 2018 (collectively
referred to as “MiFID II”) imposes certain restrictions as to the
trading of shares and derivatives including market structure-
related, reporting, investor protection-related and organizational
requirements, requirements on pre- and post-trade transparency,
requirements to use certain venues when trading financial
instruments (which includes shares and certain derivative
instruments), requirements affecting the way investment
managers can obtain research, powers of regulators to impose
position limits and provisions on regulatory sanctions. The
European regulators continue to refine aspects of MiFID with
these changes now being rolled out separately in both the UK and
Europe.
New prudential regimes for investment firms have been
implemented in both the EU and the UK for MiFID authorized
investment firms. The Investment Firms Regulation (IFR) and the
Investment Firms Directive (IFD), applicable in the EU, and the
MIFIDPRU regime, applicable in the UK, while applying a more
appropriate capital treatment for investments firms such as the
UK entity, Jefferies International Limited, and, its EU subsidiary,
Jefferies GmbH, include a requirement that a certain amount of
variable remuneration for material risk takers be paid in non-cash
instruments and have a deferral element. Consequently, we have
adapted our remuneration structures for those employees
identified as material risk takers.
13
Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
A key focus of the European regulators over the last couple of
years has been emerging regulation with regards to Operational
Resilience, with regulators expecting investment firms like
Jefferies to be able to assess (on an ongoing basis) their
resilience (measured by impact to Jefferies’ clients and market)
on identified critical business services. This has brought our
management of third party risk, business continuity and the
mitigation of cyber risk more firmly into focus with the regulators.
Significant new legislation and regulation affecting the financial
services industry is regularly proposed and sometimes adopted.
These legislative and regulatory initiatives affect not only us, but
also our competitors and certain of our clients. These changes
could have an effect on our revenue and profitability, limit our
ability to pursue certain business opportunities, impact the value
of assets that we hold, require us to change certain business
practices, impose additional costs on us and otherwise adversely
affect our business. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurance
that legislation and regulation will not eventually have an adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition. In the U.S., such initiatives frequently arise in
the aftermath of elections that change the party of the president
or the majority party in the House and/or Senate.
Increasing regulatory focus on evolving privacy and security
issues and expanding laws could impact our businesses and
investments and expose us to increased liability.
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (the “EU GDPR” or
“GDPR”) applies in all EU Member States and also applies to
entities established outside of the EU where such entity
processes personal data in relation to: (i) the offering of goods or
services to data subjects in the EEA; or (ii) monitoring the
behavior of data subjects as far as that behavior takes place in
the EEA. The UK has implemented GDPR as part of its national
law (the “UK GDPR”). The UK GDPR exists alongside the UK Data
Protection Act 2018 and its requirements are largely aligned with
those under the EU GDPR.
The EU GDPR and UK GDPR impose a number of obligations on
organizations to which they apply, including, without limitation:
accountability and transparency requirements; compliance with
the data protection rights of data subjects; and under
circumstances, the prompt reporting of certain personal data
breaches to both the relevant data supervisory authority and
impacted individuals.
The EU GDPR and UK GDPR also include restrictions on the
transfer of personal data from the EEA to jurisdictions that are
not recognized as having an adequate level of protection with
regards to data protection laws.
The EU GDPR imposes significant fines for serious non-
compliance of up to the higher of 4% of an organization’s annual
worldwide turnover or €20 million (or approximately £17.5 million
under the UK GDPR). Data subjects also have a right to receive
compensation as a result of infringement of the EU GDPR and/or
UK GDPR for financial or non-financial losses.
Other privacy laws are in effect in the Americas, Europe and the
Middle East and Asia-Pacific regions, many of which involve
heightened compliance obligations similar to those under EU
GDPR and UK GDPR. The privacy and cybersecurity legislative
and regulatory landscape is evolving rapidly, and numerous
proposals regarding privacy and cybersecurity are pending before
U.S. and non-U.S. legislative and regulatory bodies. The adopted
form of such developing legislation and regulation will determine
the level of any resources which we will need to invest to ensure
compliance. In the event of non-compliance with privacy laws
and regulations, we could face significant administrative and
monetary sanctions as well as reputational damage which may
have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial
condition and prospects.
Extensive regulation of our business limits our activities, and, if
we violate these regulations, we may be subject to significant
penalties.
We are subject to extensive laws, rules and regulations in the
countries in which we operate. Firms that engage in providing
financial services must comply with the laws, rules and
regulations imposed by national and state governments and
regulatory and self-regulatory bodies with jurisdiction over such
activities. Such laws, rules and regulations cover many aspects
of providing financial services.
Our regulators supervise our business activities to monitor
compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. In
addition, if there are instances in which our regulators question
our compliance with laws, rules, or regulations, they may
investigate the facts and circumstances to determine whether we
have complied. At any moment in time, we may be subject to one
or more such investigations or similar reviews. At this time, all
such investigations and similar reviews are insignificant in scope
and immaterial to us. However, there can be no assurance that, in
the future, the operations of our businesses will not violate such
laws, rules, or regulations, or that such investigations and similar
reviews will not result in significant or material adverse regulatory
requirements, regulatory enforcement actions, fines or other
adverse impact to the operation of our business.
Additionally, violations of laws, rules and regulations could
subject us to one or more of the following events: civil and
criminal liability; sanctions, which could include the revocation of
our subsidiaries’ registrations as investment advisors or broker-
dealers; the revocation of the licenses of our financial advisors;
censures; fines; or a temporary suspension or permanent bar
from conducting business. The occurrence of any of these events
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and prospects.
Certain of our subsidiaries are subject to regulatory financial
capital holding requirements that could impact various capital
allocation decisions or limit the operations of our broker-dealers.
In particular, compliance with the financial capital holding
requirement may restrict our broker-dealers’ ability to engage in
capital-intensive activities such as underwriting and trading, and
may also limit their ability to make loans, advances, dividends
and other payments and may restrict our swap dealer’s ability to
execute certain derivative transactions.
Additional legislation, changes in rules, changes in the
interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules, conflicts
and inconsistencies among rules and regulations, or the entering
into businesses that subject us to new rules and regulations may
directly affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition. We continue to monitor the impact of new U.S. and
international regulation on our businesses.
Legal liability may harm our business.
Many aspects of our business involve substantial risks of liability,
and in the normal course of business, we have been named as a
defendant or codefendant in lawsuits involving primarily claims
for damages. The risks associated with potential legal liabilities
often may be difficult to assess or quantify and their existence
and magnitude often remain unknown for substantial periods of
time. The expansion of our business, including increases in the
number and size of investment banking transactions and our
November 2024 Form 10-K
14
expansion into new areas impose greater risks of liability.
Substantial legal liability could have a material adverse financial
effect or cause us significant reputational harm, which in turn
could seriously harm our business and our prospects.
A change in tax laws in key jurisdictions could materially increase
our tax expense.
We are subject to tax in the U.S. and numerous international
jurisdictions. Changes to income tax laws and regulations in any
of the jurisdictions in which we operate, or in the interpretation of
such laws, or the introduction of new taxes, could significantly
increase our effective tax rate and ultimately reduce our cash
flow from operating activities and otherwise have an adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
If our tax filing positions were to be challenged by federal, state
and local, or foreign tax jurisdictions, we may not be wholly
successful in defending our tax filing positions.
We record reserves for unrecognized tax benefits based on our
assessment of the probability of successfully sustaining tax filing
positions. Management exercises significant judgment when
assessing the probability of successfully sustaining tax filing
positions, and in determining whether a contingent tax liability
should be recorded and, if so, estimating the amount. If our tax
filing positions are successfully challenged, payments could be
required that are in excess of reserved amounts or we may be
required to reduce the carrying amount of our net deferred tax
asset, either of which result could be significant to our financial
condition or results of operations.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C.Item 1A. Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy
Our Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) and the Global
Information Security team (“GIS”) oversee our cybersecurity
program and exercise overall responsibility for the strategic
vision, design, development and implementation of, and
adherence to, the program’s protocols. The comprehensive
program includes policies and procedures designed to protect
our systems, operations and the data entrusted to it from
anticipated threats or hazards. The program applies seven layers
of controls: governance, identification, protection, detection,
response, recovery and third-party vendor management. The
CISO reviews the cybersecurity framework annually as well as on
an event-driven basis, as necessary, and reviews the scope of
cybersecurity measures periodically, including to accommodate
changes in business practices that may implicate security-related
issues.
Protective measures, where appropriate, include, but are not
limited to, physical and digital access controls, software security
and patch management, identity verification, mobile device
management, data loss prevention solutions, employee
cybersecurity awareness communications and best practices
training programs, security baselines and tools to detect and
report anomalous activity, service provider risk assessments,
network monitoring, hardware and software, and data erasure
and media disposal. Measures, policies and standards are
aligned with industry-leading frameworks, such as those
promulgated by the International Organization for
Standardization and the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (“NIST”).
We test our cybersecurity defenses regularly through automated
vulnerability scanning to identify and remediate critical
vulnerabilities. In addition, an independent vendor conducts
annual penetration tests to validate our external security posture.
For certain businesses, we also conduct cyber incident tabletop
exercises involving hypothetical cybersecurity incidents to test
our cyber incident response processes. Tabletop exercises are
conducted by the Information Technology Risk team in
collaboration with outside service providers, as appropriate, and
members of senior management and Legal and Compliance.
Learnings from these tabletop exercises and any events that we
experience are reviewed, discussed, and incorporated into our
cybersecurity risk management processes, as appropriate.
In addition to our internal exercises to test aspects of our
cybersecurity program, we annually engage an independent third
party to assess information system risks and the maturity of our
cyber security program. The independent third party assesses the
cybersecurity program against the Cyber Risk Institute Cyber
Profile, a financial sector-focused framework based on the NIST
Cybersecurity Framework, the results of which are reported to the
Board of Directors and inform our program.
We have a comprehensive cybersecurity incident response and
communication plan (the “IRP”), managed by the Security
Operations Group, which is designed to inform appropriate risk
management and business managers of non-routine suspected
or confirmed information security or cybersecurity events based
on the expected risk an event presents. A team composed of
individuals from several internal technical and managerial
functions may be formed to investigate and remediate such an
event and determine the extent of external advisor support
required, including from external counsel, forensic investigators
and law enforcement agencies. The IRP is reviewed at least
annually.
Cybersecurity is assessed by Information Technology Risk and
approved by the Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) as a component
of our annual, enterprise-wide Risk Control Self Assessment
(“RCSA”) managed by the Operational Risk Group. The RCSA
process is independently verified by the Internal Audit
Department. Additionally, our cybersecurity risk management
process includes reviewing risks discerned from time to time
from both internal events and from external events, alerts and
reports received from a broad variety of sources. Reports from
external sources are also reviewed to formulate risk mitigation
and remediation strategies. The CISO periodically discusses and
reviews cybersecurity risks and related mitigants with the CIO,
the Head of Information Technology Risk and General Counsel
and incorporates relevant cybersecurity risk updates and metrics.
We conduct periodic risk assessments and adjust and enhance
our cybersecurity program in response to the evolving
cybersecurity landscape and to align with regulatory and industry
standards.
We also employ a process designed to periodically assess the
cybersecurity risks associated with the engagement of third-party
vendors and service providers. This assessment is conducted on
the basis of, among other factors, the types of products or
services provided and the extent and type of data accessed or
processed by the third party.
Cybersecurity Governance
Our Board’s Risk and Liquidity Oversight Committee oversees
Jefferies’ enterprise risk management. Oversight includes
annually reviewing and approving the risk management
framework and overarching risk appetite statements, which
includes reviewing technology, cybersecurity and privacy risk and
15
Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
reviewing the steps management has taken to monitor and
control such exposures. The CISO keeps the Board informed
about our security posture and cybersecurity maturity program
on a regular basis, providing updates about the current threat
landscape and related risks, cybersecurity events, significant
incidents and new initiatives.
Our cybersecurity program is periodically assessed by the
Internal Audit Department. The results of these audits are
reported to the Audit Committee. Any resulting findings and
associated actions to address issues are tracked and managed
to completion. In addition, the Information Technology Risk team
provides key risk indicators (“KRIs”) monthly to the Operational
Risk Committee whose members include the CIO, Chief Risk
Officer (“CRO”), Head of Internal Audit and the CISO. The monthly
presentation includes updates on key security incidents and the
trending of cybersecurity KRIs.
Our dedicated GIS team is led by the CISO, who reports to the
CIO. The CISO has extensive experience in cybersecurity and
technology with over twenty years’ experience managing
cybersecurity in the financial and consulting services industries
and is responsible for all aspects of cybersecurity across our
global businesses. The CISO works closely with the CIO, Chief
Financial Officer, CRO and the Legal and Compliance
Departments to develop and advance our cybersecurity strategy.
Recently Filed
Click on a ticker to see risk factors
Ticker * File Date
PYPL 10 hours ago
HMMR 10 hours ago
OTIS 10 hours ago
PEAK 11 hours ago
SLAB 12 hours ago
DOW 19 hours ago
BKR 20 hours ago
PEP 1 day, 9 hours ago
FCFS 1 day, 10 hours ago
RTX 1 day, 10 hours ago
KREF 1 day, 10 hours ago
BA 1 day, 13 hours ago
GE 1 day, 21 hours ago
JVA 4 days, 10 hours ago
ISRG 4 days, 10 hours ago
INTC 4 days, 10 hours ago
CMCSA 4 days, 11 hours ago
TMUS 4 days, 11 hours ago
SKKY 4 days, 11 hours ago
X 4 days, 15 hours ago
CHTR 4 days, 20 hours ago
NOC 5 days, 11 hours ago
NOBH 5 days, 12 hours ago
SIRI 5 days, 18 hours ago
NOW 6 days, 5 hours ago
TSLA 6 days, 7 hours ago
META 6 days, 7 hours ago
CCS 6 days, 7 hours ago
BRID 6 days, 10 hours ago
FLUX 6 days, 10 hours ago
SVBL 6 days, 10 hours ago
PBSV 6 days, 10 hours ago
URI 6 days, 11 hours ago
MXL 6 days, 11 hours ago
LEVI 6 days, 11 hours ago
OCEL 6 days, 11 hours ago
FREVS 6 days, 18 hours ago
CODA 6 days, 20 hours ago
JEF 1 week ago
NRIX 1 week ago
LMT 1 week ago
CRGH 1 week ago
GM 1 week ago
CNXC 1 week ago
CCL 1 week, 1 day ago
MULN 1 week, 4 days ago
KBH 1 week, 4 days ago
SNX 1 week, 4 days ago
LEN 1 week, 5 days ago
MKC 1 week, 5 days ago

OTHER DATASETS

House Trading

Dashboard

Corporate Flights

Dashboard

App Ratings

Dashboard